 |
Disputation of Doctor
Martin Luther on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences
by Dr. Martin Luther, 1517
|
 |
These Theses resulted in the excommunication of
Martin Luther, and the ideas contained in this document gave
impetus to the Reformation.
Out of love for the truth and the desire to bring it to light,
the following propositions will be discussed at Wittenberg, under
the presidency of the Reverend Father Martin Luther, Master of
Arts and of Sacred Theology, and Lecturer in Ordinary on the same
at that place. Wherefore he requests that those who are unable to
be present and debate orally with us, may do so by letter.
In the Name our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.
- Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, when He said
Poenitentiam agite, willed that the whole life of
believers should be repentance.
- This word cannot be understood to mean sacramental
penance, i.e., confession and satisfaction, which is
administered by the priests.
- Yet it means not inward repentance only; nay, there is no
inward repentance which does not outwardly work divers
mortifications of the flesh.
- The penalty [of sin], therefore, continues so long as
hatred of self continues; for this is the true inward
repentance, and continues until our entrance into the
kingdom of heaven.
- The pope does not intend to remit, and cannot remit any
penalties other than those which he has imposed either by
his own authority or by that of the Canons.
- The pope cannot remit any guilt, except by declaring that
it has been remitted by God and by assenting to God's
remission; though, to be sure, he may grant remission in
cases reserved to his judgment. If his right to grant
remission in such cases were despised, the guilt would
remain entirely unforgiven.
- God remits guilt to no one whom He does not, at the same
time, humble in all things and bring into subjection to
His vicar, the priest.
- The penitential canons are imposed only on the living,
and, according to them, nothing should be imposed on the
dying.
- Therefore the Holy Spirit in the pope is kind to us,
because in his decrees he always makes exception of the
article of death and of necessity.
- Ignorant and wicked are the doings of those priests who,
in the case of the dying, reserve canonical penances for
purgatory.
- This changing of the canonical penalty to the penalty of
purgatory is quite evidently one of the tares that were
sown while the bishops slept.
- In former times the canonical penalties were imposed not
after, but before absolution, as tests of true
contrition.
- The dying are freed by death from all penalties; they are
already dead to canonical rules, and have a right to be
released from them.
- The imperfect health [of soul], that is to say, the
imperfect love, of the dying brings with it, of
necessity, great fear; and the smaller the love, the
greater is the fear.
- This fear and horror is sufficient of itself alone (to
say nothing of other things) to constitute the penalty of
purgatory, since it is very near to the horror of
despair.
- Hell, purgatory, and heaven seem to differ as do despair,
almost-despair, and the assurance of safety.
- With souls in purgatory it seems necessary that horror
should grow less and love increase.
- It seems unproved, either by reason or Scripture, that
they are outside the state of merit, that is to say, of
increasing love.
- Again, it seems unproved that they, or at least that all
of them, are certain or assured of their own blessedness,
though we may be quite certain of it.
- Therefore by "full remission of all penalties"
the pope means not actually "of all," but only
of those imposed by himself.
- Therefore those preachers of indulgences are in error,
who say that by the pope's indulgences a man is freed
from every penalty, and saved;
- Whereas he remits to souls in purgatory no penalty which,
according to the canons, they would have had to pay in
this life.
- If it is at all possible to grant to any one the
remission of all penalties whatsoever, it is certain that
this remission can be granted only to the most perfect,
that is, to the very fewest.
- It must needs be, therefore, that the greater part of the
people are deceived by that indiscriminate and
highsounding promise of release from penalty.
- The power which the pope has, in a general way, over
purgatory, is just like the power which any bishop or
curate has, in a special way, within his own diocese or
parish.
- The pope does well when he grants remission to souls [in
purgatory], not by the power of the keys (which he does
not possess), but by way of intercession.
- They preach man who say that so soon as the penny jingles
into the money-box, the soul flies out [of purgatory].
- It is certain that when the penny jingles into the
money-box, gain and avarice can be increased, but the
result of the intercession of the Church is in the power
of God alone.
- Who knows whether all the souls in purgatory wish to be
bought out of it, as in the legend of Sts. Severinus and
Paschal.
- No one is sure that his own contrition is sincere; much
less that he has attained full remission.
- Rare as is the man that is truly penitent, so rare is
also the man who truly buys indulgences, i.e., such men
are most rare.
- They will be condemned eternally, together with their
teachers, who believe themselves sure of their salvation
because they have letters of pardon.
- Men must be on their guard against those who say that the
pope's pardons are that inestimable gift of God by which
man is reconciled to Him;
- For these "graces of pardon" concern only the
penalties of sacramental satisfaction, and these are
appointed by man.
- They preach no Christian doctrine who teach that
contrition is not necessary in those who intend to buy
souls out of purgatory or to buy confessionalia.
- Every truly repentant Christian has a right to full
remission of penalty and guilt, even without letters of
pardon.
- Every true Christian, whether living or dead, has part in
all the blessings of Christ and the Church; and this is
granted him by God, even without letters of pardon.
- Nevertheless, the remission and participation [in the
blessings of the Church] which are granted by the pope
are in no way to be despised, for they are, as I have
said, the declaration of divine remission.
- It is most difficult, even for the very keenest
theologians, at one and the same time to commend to the
people the abundance of pardons and [the need of] true
contrition.
- True contrition seeks and loves penalties, but liberal
pardons only relax penalties and cause them to be hated,
or at least, furnish an occasion [for hating them].
- Apostolic pardons are to be preached with caution, lest
the people may falsely think them preferable to other
good works of love.
- Christians are to be taught that the pope does not intend
the buying of pardons to be compared in any way to works
of mercy.
- Christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor
or lends to the needy does a better work than buying
pardons;
- Because love grows by works of love, and man becomes
better; but by pardons man does not grow better, only
more free from penalty.
- Christians are to be taught that he who sees a man in
need, and passes him by, and gives [his money] for
pardons, purchases not the indulgences of the pope, but
the indignation of God.
- Christians are to be taught that unless they have more
than they need, they are bound to keep back what is
necessary for their own families, and by no means to
squander it on pardons.
- Christians are to be taught that the buying of pardons is
a matter of free will, and not of commandment.
- Christians are to be taught that the pope, in granting
pardons, needs, and therefore desires, their devout
prayer for him more than the money they bring.
- Christians are to be taught that the pope's pardons are
useful, if they do not put their trust in them; but
altogether harmful, if through them they lose their fear
of God.
- Christians are to be taught that if the pope knew the
exactions of the pardon-preachers, he would rather that
St. Peter's church should go to ashes, than that it
should be built up with the skin, flesh and bones of his
sheep.
- Christians are to be taught that it would be the pope's
wish, as it is his duty, to give of his own money to very
many of those from whom certain hawkers of pardons cajole
money, even though the church of St. Peter might have to
be sold.
- The assurance of salvation by letters of pardon is vain,
even though the commissary, nay, even though the pope
himself, were to stake his soul upon it.
- They are enemies of Christ and of the pope, who bid the
Word of God be altogether silent in some Churches, in
order that pardons may be preached in others.
- Injury is done the Word of God when, in the same sermon,
an equal or a longer time is spent on pardons than on
this Word.
- It must be the intention of the pope that if pardons,
which are a very small thing, are celebrated with one
bell, with single processions and ceremonies, then the
Gospel, which is the very greatest thing, should be
preached with a hundred bells, a hundred processions, a
hundred ceremonies.
- The "treasures of the Church," out of which the
pope grants indulgences, are not sufficiently named or
known among the people of Christ.
- That they are not temporal treasures is certainly
evident, for many of the vendors do not pour out such
treasures so easily, but only gather them.
- Nor are they the merits of Christ and the Saints, for
even without the pope, these always work grace for the
inner man, and the cross, death, and hell for the outward
man.
- St. Lawrence said that the treasures of the Church were
the Church's poor, but he spoke according to the usage of
the word in his own time.
- Without rashness we say that the keys of the Church,
given by Christ's merit, are that treasure;
- For it is clear that for the remission of penalties and
of reserved cases, the power of the pope is of itself
sufficient.
- The true treasure of the Church is the Most Holy Gospel
of the glory and the grace of God.
- But this treasure is naturally most odious, for it makes
the first to be last.
- On the other hand, the treasure of indulgences is
naturally most acceptable, for it makes the last to be
first.
- Therefore the treasures of the Gospel are nets with which
they formerly were wont to fish for men of riches.
- The treasures of the indulgences are nets with which they
now fish for the riches of men.
- The indulgences which the preachers cry as the
"greatest graces" are known to be truly such,
in so far as they promote gain.
- Yet they are in truth the very smallest graces compared
with the grace of God and the piety of the Cross.
- Bishops and curates are bound to admit the commissaries
of apostolic pardons, with all reverence.
- But still more are they bound to strain all their eyes
and attend with all their ears, lest these men preach
their own dreams instead of the commission of the pope.
- He who speaks against the truth of apostolic pardons, let
him be anathema and accursed!
- But he who guards against the lust and license of the
pardon-preachers, let him be blessed!
- The pope justly thunders against those who, by any art,
contrive the injury of the traffic in pardons.
- But much more does he intend to thunder against those who
use the pretext of pardons to contrive the injury of holy
love and truth.
- To think the papal pardons so great that they could
absolve a man even if he had committed an impossible sin
and violated the Mother of God - this is madness.
- We say, on the contrary, that the papal pardons are not
able to remove the very least of venial sins, so far as
its guilt is concerned.
- It is said that even St. Peter, if he were now Pope,
could not bestow greater graces; this is blasphemy
against St. Peter and against the pope.
- We say, on the contrary, that even the present pope, and
any pope at all, has greater graces at his disposal; to
wit, the Gospel, powers, gifts of healing, etc., as it is
written in I. Corinthians xii.
- To say that the cross, emblazoned with the papal arms,
which is set up [by the preachers of indulgences], is of
equal worth with the Cross of Christ, is blasphemy.
- The bishops, curates and theologians who allow such talk
to be spread among the people, will have an account to
render.
- This unbridled preaching of pardons makes it no easy
matter, even for learned men, to rescue the reverence due
to the pope from slander, or even from the shrewd
questionings of the laity.
- To wit: - "Why does not the pope empty purgatory,
for the sake of holy love and of the dire need of the
souls that are there, if he redeems an infinite number of
souls for the sake of miserable money with which to build
a Church? The former reasons would be most just; the
latter is most trivial."
- Again: - "Why are mortuary and anniversary masses
for the dead continued, and why does he not return or
permit the withdrawal of the endowments founded on their
behalf, since it is wrong to pray for the redeemed?"
- Again: - "What is this new piety of God and the
pope, that for money they allow a man who is impious and
their enemy, to buy out of purgatory the pious soul of a
friend of God, and do not rather, because of that pious
and beloved soul's own need, free it for pure love's
sake?"
- Again: - "Why are the penitential canons long since
in actual fact and through disuse abrogated and dead, now
satisfied by the granting of indulgences, as though they
were still alive and in force?"
- Again: - "Why does not the pope, whose wealth is
to-day greater than the riches of the richest, build just
this one church of St. Peter with his own money, rather
than with the money of poor believers?"
- Again: - "What is it that the pope remits, and what
participation does he grant to those who, by perfect
contrition, have a right to full remission and
participation?"
- Again: - "What greater blessing could come to the
Church than if the pope were to do a hundred times a day
what he now does once, and bestow on every believer these
remissions and participations?"
- "Since the pope, by his pardons, seeks the salvation
of souls rather than money, why does he suspend the
indulgences and pardons granted heretofore, since these
have equal efficacy?"
- To repress these arguments and scruples of the laity by
force alone, and not to resolve them by giving reasons,
is to expose the Church and the pope to the ridicule of
their enemies, and to make Christians unhappy.
- If, therefore, pardons were preached according to the
spirit and mind of the pope, all these doubts would be
readily resolved; nay, they would not exist.
- Away, then, with all those prophets who say to the people
of Christ, "Peace, peace," and there is no
peace!
- Blessed be all those prophets who say to the people of
Christ, "Cross, cross," and there is no cross!
- Christians are to be exhorted that they be diligent in
following Christ, their Head, through penalties, deaths,
and hell;
- And thus be confident of entering into heaven rather
through many tribulations, than through the assurance of
peace.
Please give feedback to Bill Drennon, webmaster for CVC
Return to Central Valley Christian School's full home page
Return to Central Valley Christian School's fast home page
Return to Drennon Dolphin Websurfer
